The trickle down from environmental innovation to productive complexity

The trickle down from environmental innovation to productive complexity
  • European Commission Towards a sustainable europe by 2030. In: Reflection paper (European Commission, 2019).

  • World Economic Forum. The global risks report 2018 13th ed. In: Geneva (World Economic Forum, 2018).

  • McMichael, A. J., Woodruff, R. E. & Hales, S. Climate change and human health: Present and future risks. Lancet 367, 859–869 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • OECD. Towards green growth: A summary for policy makers. (OECD Publishing, 201).

  • Popp, D., Newell, R. & Jaffe, A. Energy, the environment, and technological change. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. II (eds Rosenberg, N. & Halland, B.) 873–938 (Academic Press, Burlington, 2010).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brunnermeier, S. B. & Cohenc, M. A. Determinants of environmental innovation in us manufacturing industries. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45, 278–293 (2003).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Costantini, V. & Mazzanti, M. On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on eu exports. Res. Policy 41, 132–153 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chai, J. The impact of green innovation on export quality. Appl. Econ. Lett. 20, 1-8 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lodi, C. & Bertarelli, S. Eco-innovation and exports in heterogeneous firms: Pollution haven effect and porter hypothesis as competing theories. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 1–30 (2022).

  • Wang, L., Chang, H.-L., Rizvi, S. K. A. & Sari, A. Are eco-innovation and export diversification mutually exclusive to control carbon emissions in G-7 countries?. J. Environ. Manag. 270, 110829 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Galera-Quiles, M. d. C., Piedra-Muñoz, L., Galdeano-Gómez, E., Carreño-Ortega, A. et al. et al. A review of eco-innovations and exports interrelationship with special reference to international agrifood supply chains. Sustainability 13, 1–21 (2021).

  • Hausmann, R., Hwang, J. & Rodrik, D. What you export matters. J. Econ. Growth 12, 1–25 (2007).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hidalgo, C. A. & Hausmann, R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 10570–10575 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A. & Pietronero, L. A new metrics for countries’ fitness and products’ complexity. Sci. Rep. 723, 1–7 (2012).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saltarelli, F., Cimini, V., Tacchella, A., Zaccaria, A. & Cristelli, M. Is export a probe for domestic production?. Front. Phys. 8, 180 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barbieri, N., Perruchas, F. & Consoli, D. Specialization, diversification, and environmental technology life cycle. Econ. Geogr. 96, 161–186 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perruchas, F., Consoli, D. & Barbieri, N. Specialisation, diversification and the ladder of green technology development. Research Policy 49, 103922 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sbardella, A., Perruchas, F., Napolitano, L., Barbieri, N. & Consoli, D. Green technology fitness. Entropy 20, 776 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barbieri, N. et al. Regional technological capabilities and green opportunities in Europe. J. Technol. Transf., 1-30 (2022).

  • Barbieri, N., Marzucchi, A. & Rizzo, U. Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones?. Res. Policy 49, 103901 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Montresor, S. & Quatraro, F. Green technologies and smart specialisation strategies: A european patent-based analysis of the intertwining of technological relatedness and key enabling technologies. Reg. Stud. 54, 1354–1365 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hausmann, R. & Hidalgo, C. A. The network structure of economic output. J. Econ. Growth 16, 309–342 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA), 1982).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dosi, G. & Nelson, R. R. An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. J. Evolut. Econ. 4, 153–172 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hirschman, A. O. The Strategy of Economic Development (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1958).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Prebisch, R. The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems (United Nations, Economic Bulletin for Latin America, New York, 1950).

  • Cristelli, M., Tacchella, A., Cader, M., Roster, K. & Pietronero, L. On the Predictability of Growth (World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2017).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hausmann, R., Rodriguez, F. R. & Wagner, R. A. Growth collapses. KSG Working Paper No. RWP06-046, CID Working Paper No. 136 (2006).

  • Tacchella, A., Mazzilli, D. & Pietronero, L. A dynamical systems approach to gross domestic product forecasting. Nat. Phys. 14, 861–865 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cristelli, M., Gabrielli, A., Tacchella, A., Caldarelli, G. & Pietronero, L. Measuring the intangibles: A metrics for the economic complexity of countries and products. PloS One 8, e70726 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zaccaria, A., Cristelli, M., Tacchella, A. & Pietronero, L. How the taxonomy of products drives the economic development of countries. PloS One 9, e113770 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sbardella, A., Pugliese, E., Zaccaria, A. & Scaramozzino, P. The role of complex analysis in modelling economic growth. Entropy 20, 883 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • World bank: Economic Fitness. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search?q=economic%20fitness

  • European Commission. Complexity. https://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/complexity.

  • Fankhauser, S. et al. Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 23, 902–913 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hamwey, R., Pacini, H. & Assunção, L. Mapping green product spaces of nations. J. Environ. & Dev. 22, 155–168 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mealy, P. & Teytelboym, A. Economic complexity and the green economy. Res. Policy 103948 (2020).

  • Pérez-Hernández, C. C., Salazar-Hernández, B. C., Mendoza-Moheno, J., Cruz-Coria, E. & Hernández-Calzada, M. A. Mapping the green product-space in mexico: From capabilities to green opportunities. Sustainability 13, 945 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Napolitano, L., Sbardella, A., Consoli, D. Barbieri, N. & Perruchas, F. Green innovation and income inequality: A complex system analysis. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. (2022).

  • Santoalha, A. & Boschma, R. Diversifying in green technologies in european regions: Does political support matter?. Reg. Stud. 55, 182–195 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ferraz, D., Falguera, F. P., Mariano, E. B. & Hartmann, D. Linking economic complexity, diversification, and industrial policy with sustainable development: A structured literature review. Sustainability 13, 1265 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • bardella, A. et al. The regional green potential of the european innovation system. Tech. Rep., Joint Research Centre-European Commission policy brief (2022).

  • Santoalha, A., Consoli, D. & Castellacci, F. Digital skills, relatedness and green diversification: A study of european regions. Res. Policy 50, 104340 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arts, S., Appio, F. P. & Van Looy, B. Inventions shaping technological trajectories: Do existing patent indicators provide a comprehensive picture?. Scientometrics 97, 397–419 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Griliches, Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. In R &D and productivity: The econometric evidence, 287–343 (University of Chicago Press, 1998).

  • Lanjouw, J. O., Pakes, A. & Putnam, J. How to count patents and value intellectual property: The uses of patent renewal and application data. J. Ind. Econ. 46, 405–432 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. & Malerba, F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Res. Policy 32, 69–87 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boschma, R., Minondo, A. & Navarro, M. The emergence of new industries at the regional level in spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness. Econ. Geogr. 89, 29–51 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pugliese, E., Napolitano, L., Zaccaria, A. & Pietronero, L. Coherent diversification in corporate technological portfolios. PloS One 14, e0223403 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L. & Hausmann, R. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317, 482–487 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pugliese, E. et al. Unfolding the innovation system for the development of countries: Coevolution of science, technology and production. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saracco, F. et al. Inferring monopartite projections of bipartite networks: An entropy-based approach. New J. Phys. 19, 053022 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • European Commission. Critical raw materials resilience: Charting a path towards greater security and sustainability. Tech. Rep., European Commission, Brussels (2020).

  • Hund, K., La Porta, D., Fabregas, T., Laing, T. & Drexhage, J. Minerals for climate action: The mineral intensity of the clean energy transition. Tech. Rep., The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433, USA (2020).

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions. Tech. Rep., International Energy Agency, Paris (2021).

  • Romare, M. & Dahllöf, L. The life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from lithium-ion batteries (2017).

  • Valero, A., Valero, A., Calvo, G. & Ortego, A. Material bottlenecks in the future development of green technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 93, 178–200 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • European Commission. The european green deal. Tech. Rep., European Commission, Brussels (2019).

  • Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Martiskainen, M., Brock, A. & Turnheim, B. The decarbonisation divide: Contextualizing landscapes of low-carbon exploitation and toxicity in africa. Glob. Environ. Chang. 60, 102028 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Squartini, T. & Garlaschelli, D. Analytical maximum-likelihood method to detect patterns in real networks. New J. Phys. 13, 083001 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • European Patenting Office. EPO worldwide patent statistical database data catalog, Climate change mitigation technologies (2018).

  • Ritchie, H., Roser, M. & Rosado, P. \(\rm CO_2\) and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data (2020). https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions.

  • Karali, N. & Shah, N. Bolstering supplies of critical raw materials for low-carbon technologies through circular economy strategies. Energy Res. & Soc. Sci. 88, 102534 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Golroudbary, S. R., Calisaya-Azpilcueta, D. & Kraslawski, A. The life cycle of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from critical minerals recycling: Case of lithium-ion batteries. Procedia CIRP 80, 316–321 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Herrington, R. Mining our green future. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 456–458 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • European Commission. Report on raw materials for battery applications. Tech. Rep., European Commission, Brussels (2018).

  • European Commission. Tackling the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials. Tech. Rep., European Commission, Brussels (2011).

  • Idoine, N. et al. World mineral production 2016-2020. Tech. Rep. (British geological survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, 2022).

  • Parkinson, C. L. Coming Climate Crisis? Consider the Past, Beware the Big Fix (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, 2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sarewitz, D. & Nelson, R. Three rules for technological fixes. Nature 456, 871 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • European Commission. A clean planet for all: A european strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy Tech. Rep, European Commission, Brussels (2018).

  • WTO. The Doha mandate. Tech. Rep., World Trade Organisation (2001).

  • Sauvage, J. The Stringency of Environmental Regulations and Trade in Environmental Goods. OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, No. 2014/03. (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2014).

  • Steenblik, R. P. Code shift: The environmental significance of the 2022 amendments to the harmonized system Tech. Rep, International Institute for Sustainable Development (2020).

  • Patelli, A., Cimini, G., Pugliese, E. & Gabrielli, A. The scientific influence of nations on global scientific and technological development. J. Informetr. 11, 1229–1237 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Azadi, M., Northey, S. A., Ali, S. H. & Edraki, M. Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation. Nat. Geosci. 13, 100–104 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Norgate, T. & Haque, N. Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 266–274 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Okafor-Yarwood, I. & Adewumi, I. J. Toxic waste dumping in the global south as a form of environmental racism: Evidence from the gulf of guinea. Afr. Stud. 79, 285–304 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Balassa, B. Trade liberalisation and “revealed’’ comparative advantage 1. Manch. Sch. 33, 99–123 (1965).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G. & Winter, S. Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. J. Econ. Behav. & Organ. 23, 1–30 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cimini, G., Carra, A., Didomenicantonio, L. & Zaccaria, A. Meta-validation of bipartite network projections. Commun. Phys. 5, 1–12 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saracco, F., Di Clemente, R., Gabrielli, A. & Squartini, T. Randomizing bipartite networks: The case of the world trade web. Sci. Rep. 5, 10595 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaynes, E. T. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. Ser. II(106), 620–630 (1957).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Related posts