Kejun, J. et al. Transition of the Chinese economy in the face of deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts in the future. Asian Econ. Policy Rev. 16(1), 142–162 (2021).
COP26, United nations climate change. https://unfccc.int/news/cop26-facts-and-figures, (2020).
Dong, Y., Coleman, M. and Miller, S. A. Greenhouse gas emissions from air conditioning and refrigeration service expansion in developing countries. Annual Rev. Environ. Resour. 46 (2021).
Azam, M. & Khan, A. Q. Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 63, 556–567 (2016).
Li, Z. et al. An economic analysis software for evaluating best management practices to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from cropland. Agric. Syst. 186, 102950 (2021).
Dinda, S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecol. Econ. 49(4), 431–455 (2004).
Xia, Q. et al. Drivers of global and national CO2 emissions changes 2000–2017. Climate Policy 21(5), 604–615 (2021).
Fatima, T., Shahzad, U. & Cui, L. Renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade and CO2 emissions in high emitter countries: Does the income level matter?. J. Environ. Planning Manage. 64(7), 1227–1251 (2021).
Kılavuz, E. & Doğan, İ. Economic growth, openness, industry and CO2 modelling: Are regulatory policies important in Turkish economies?. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 16(2), 476–487 (2021).
Setyari, N. P. W. & Kusuma, W. G. A. Economics and environmental development: Testing the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 11(4), 51 (2021).
Gołasa, P. et al. Sources of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture, with particular emphasis on emissions from energy used. Energies 14(13), 3784 (2021).
Liobikienė, G. & Butkus, M. The challenges and opportunities of climate change policy under different stages of economic development. Sci. Total Environ. 642, 999–1007 (2018).
Koondhar, M. A. et al. A visualization review analysis of the last two decades for environmental Kuznets curve “EKC” based on co-citation analysis theory and pathfinder network scaling algorithms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(13), 16690–16706 (2021).
Bilgili, F., Koçak, E. & Bulut, Ü. The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 54, 838–845 (2016).
Gorus, M. S. & Aydin, M. The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emission in MENA countries: Causality analysis in the frequency domain. Energy 168, 815–822 (2019).
Kirikkaleli, D. & Adebayo, T. S. Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustain. Develop. 29(4), 583–594 (2021).
Godil, D. I. et al. Investigate the role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing transport sector CO2 emission in China: A path toward sustainable development. Sustain. Develop. (2021).
An, T., Xu, C. & Liao, X. The impact of FDI on environmental pollution in China: Evidence from spatial panel data. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 1–13 (2021).
Halliru, A. M., Loganathan, N. and Golam Hassan, A. A. Does FDI and economic growth harm environment? Evidence from selected West African countries. Trans. Corp. Rev., 13(2), 237–251 (2021.).
Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I. & Solarin, S. A. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: The role of renewable energy. Ecol. Ind. 67, 267–282 (2016).
Zhang, D. et al. Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: Mediating role of green finance. Energy Policy 153, 112256 (2021).
Usman, M. et al. How do financial development, energy consumption, natural resources, and globalization affect Arctic countries’ economic growth and environmental quality? An advanced panel data simulation. Energy, 122515 (2021).
Rehman, A. et al. The impact of globalization, energy use, and trade on ecological footprint in Pakistan: does environmental sustainability exist?. Energies 14(17), 5234 (2021).
Bremond, U. et al. A vision of European biogas sector development towards 2030: Trends and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 287, 125065 (2021).
Abdul Latif, S. N. et al. The trend and status of energy resources and greenhouse gas emissions in the malaysia power generation mix. Energies 14(8), 2200 (2021).
Chen, P.-Y. et al. Modeling the global relationships among economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 65, 420–431 (2016).
Kais, S. & Sami, H. An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: Panel data evidence from fifty eight countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59, 1101–1110 (2016).
Rüstemoğlu, H. & Andrés, A. R. Determinants of CO2 emissions in Brazil and Russia between 1992 and 2011: A decomposition analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 58, 95–106 (2016).
Yao, C., Feng, K. & Hubacek, K. Driving forces of CO2 emissions in the G20 countries: An index decomposition analysis from 1971 to 2010. Eco. Inform. 26, 93–100 (2015).
González, P. F., Landajo, M. & Presno, M. The driving forces behind changes in CO2 emission levels in EU-27. Differences between member states. Environ. Sci. Policy 38, 11–16 (2014).
Nathaniel, S. P. Environmental degradation in ASEAN: assessing the criticality of natural resources abundance, economic growth and human capital. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(17), 21766–21778 (2021).
Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N. & Zhang, J. W. Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci. Total Environ. 678, 632–638 (2019).
Balsalobre-Lorente, D. et al. How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?. Energy Policy 113, 356–367 (2018).
Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A. & Sarkodie, S. A. Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 1023–1029 (2019).
Baloch, M. A. & Meng, F. Modeling the non-linear relationship between financial development and energy consumption: Statistical experience from OECD countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26(9), 8838–8846 (2019).
Dong, K., Sun, R. & Hochman, G. Do natural gas and renewable energy consumption lead to less CO2 emission? Empirical evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Energy 141, 1466–1478 (2017).
Omri, A. et al. Determinants of environmental sustainability: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 1592–1601 (2019).
Zhu, H. et al. The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: Evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ. Model. 58, 237–248 (2016).
Cheng, C. et al. Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission-evidence from the BRIICS. Sci. Total Environ. 668, 1328–1338 (2019).
Zhang, C. & Zhou, X. Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 58, 943–951 (2016).
Phung, T. Q., Rasoulinezhad, E. and Luong Thi Thu, H. How are FDI and green recovery related in Southeast Asian economies? Econ. Change Restruct. 1–21 (2022).
Quang, P.T. and Thao, D. P. Analyzing the green financing and energy efficiency relationship in ASEAN. J. Risk Financ. (2022)(ahead-of-print).
Ahmad, M. et al. Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter?. Sustain. Cities Soc. 70, 102881 (2021).
Murshed, M. An empirical analysis of the non-linear impacts of ICT-trade openness on renewable energy transition, energy efficiency, clean cooking fuel access and environmental sustainability in South Asia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(29), 36254–36281 (2020).
Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á. & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innovation 17(1), 6–23 (2015).
Wang, L. et al. Are eco-innovation and export diversification mutually exclusive to control carbon emissions in G-7 countries?. J. Environ. Manage. 270, 110829 (2020).
Su, H.-N. & Moaniba, I. M. Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 122, 49–62 (2017).
Ding, Q., Khattak, S. I. & Ahmad, M. Towards sustainable production and consumption: assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 27, 254–268 (2021).
Zhang, Y.-J. et al. Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100, 18–28 (2017).
Solarin, S. A. & Bello, M. O. Energy innovations and environmental sustainability in the US: the roles of immigration and economic expansion using a maximum likelihood method. Sci. Total Environ. 712, 135594 (2020).
Hashmi, R. & Alam, K. Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation. J. Clean. Prod. 231, 1100–1109 (2019).
Sinha, A., Sengupta, T. & Alvarado, R. Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. J. Clean. Prod. 242, 118549 (2020).
Gormus, S. & Aydin, M. Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using innovation: New evidence from the top 10 innovative economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(22), 27904–27913 (2020).
Usman, M. & Hammar, N. Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: Fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(12), 15519–15536 (2021).
Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M. & Azim, P. Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 18, 165–173 (2013).
Kong, Q. et al. Trade openness and economic growth quality of China: Empirical analysis using ARDL model. Financ. Res. Lett. 38, 101488 (2021).
Kasman, A. & Duman, Y. S. CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Econ. Model. 44, 97–103 (2015).
Ali, S. et al. Impact of trade openness, human capital, public expenditure and institutional performance on unemployment: Evidence from OIC countries. Int. J. Manpower, (2021).
Chen, F., Jiang, G. & Kitila, G. M. Trade openness and CO2 emissions: The heterogeneous and mediating effects for the belt and road countries. Sustainability 13(4), 1958 (2021).
Sun, H. et al. Nexus between environmental infrastructure and transnational cluster in one belt one road countries: Role of governance. Bus. Strategy Develop. 1(1), 17–30 (2018).
Jebli, M. B. & Youssef, S. B. The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 47, 173–185 (2015).
Jebli, M. B., Youssef, S. B. & Ozturk, I. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol. Ind. 60, 824–831 (2016).
Shahbaz, M. et al. Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecol. Ind. 45, 622–631 (2014).
Xu, B. & Lin, B. How industrialization and urbanization process impacts on CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from nonparametric additive regression models. Energy Econ. 48, 188–202 (2015).
Ertugrul, H. M. et al. The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecol. Ind. 67, 543–555 (2016).
Najarzadeh, R. et al. Kyoto Protocol and global value chains: Trade effects of an international environmental policy. Environ. Develop. 40, 100659 (2021).
Liobikienė, G. & Butkus, M. Environmental Kuznets Curve of greenhouse gas emissions including technological progress and substitution effects. Energy 135, 237–248 (2017).
Liobikienė, G. The revised approaches to income inequality impact on production-based and consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions: Literature review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(9), 8980–8990 (2020).
Li, G., Zakari, A. & Tawiah, V. Energy resource melioration and CO2 emissions in China and Nigeria: Efficiency and trade perspectives. Resour. Policy 68, 101769 (2020).
Ali, M. U. et al. Fossil energy consumption, economic development, inward FDI impact on CO2 emissions in Pakistan: Testing EKC hypothesis through ARDL model. Int. J. Financ. Econ. 26(3), 3210–3221 (2021).
Özbuğday, F. C. & Erbas, B. C. How effective are energy efficiency and renewable energy in curbing CO2 emissions in the long run? A heterogeneous panel data analysis. Energy 82, 734–745 (2015).
Wang, Q., Chiu, Y.-H. & Chiu, C.-R. Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: A modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energy Econ. 51, 252–260 (2015).
Dong, K. et al. Energy intensity and energy conservation potential in China: A regional comparison perspective. Energy 155, 782–795 (2018).
Tan, R. & Lin, B. What factors lead to the decline of energy intensity in China’s energy intensive industries?. Energy Econ. 71, 213–221 (2018).
Tariq, G. et al. Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from four developing countries. Am. J. Multidiscip. Res. 7(1), (2018).
Sharif, A. et al. Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from quantile ARDL approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 57, 102138 (2020).
Khan, I., Hou, F. & Le, H. P. The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci. Total Environ. 754, 142222 (2021).
Bölük, G. & Mert, M. Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries. Energy 74, 439–446 (2014).
Sugiawan, Y. & Managi, S. The environmental Kuznets curve in Indonesia: Exploring the potential of renewable energy. Energy Policy 98, 187–198 (2016).
Bölük, G. & Mert, M. The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: An ARDL approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 52, 587–595 (2015).
Sebri, M. & Ben-Salha, O. On the causal dynamics between economic growth, renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and trade openness: Fresh evidence from BRICS countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 39, 14–23 (2014).
Tiwari, A. K. A structural VAR analysis of renewable energy consumption, real GDP and CO2 emissions: Evidence from India. Econ. Bull. 31(2), 1793–1806 (2011).
Apergis, N. & Payne, J. E. Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia. Energy Econ. 32(6), 1392–1397 (2010).
Menyah, K. & Wolde-Rufael, Y. CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy 38(6), 2911–2915 (2010).
Fareed, Z. et al. Financial inclusion and the environmental deterioration in Eurozone: The moderating role of innovation activity. Technol. Soc. 69, 101961 (2022).
Adebayo, T. S. Renewable energy consumption and environmental sustainability in Canada: does political stability make a difference? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 1–16 (2022).
Shahbaz, M. et al. Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries?. Energy Econ. 51, 275–287 (2015).
Tariq, G. et al. Trade liberalization, FDI inflows economic growth and environmental sustanaibility in Pakistan and India. J. Agric. Environ. Int. Develop. (JAEID) 112(2), 253–269 (2018).
Lee, J. W. The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy 55, 483–489 (2013).
Sun, H.-P. et al. Evaluating the environmental effects of economic openness: Evidence from SAARC countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26(24), 24542–24551 (2019).
Adebayo, T. S. Environmental consequences of fossil fuel in Spain amidst renewable energy consumption: a new insights from the wavelet-based Granger causality approach. Int. J. Sustain. Develop. World Ecol. 1–14 (2022).
Adebayo, T. S. et al. Impact of tourist arrivals on environmental quality: A way towards environmental sustainability targets. Current Issues Tourism, 1–19 (2022).
Akadiri, S.S. et al. Testing the role of economic complexity on the ecological footprint in China: A nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach. Energy Environ. 0958305X221094573 (2022).
Xie, Q. et al. Race to environmental sustainability: Can renewable energy consumption and technological innovation sustain the strides for China? Renew. Energy (2022).
Du, L. et al. Asymmetric effects of high-tech industry and renewable energy on consumption-based carbon emissions in MINT countries. Renew. Energy 196, 1269–1280 (2022).
Al-Mulali, U. & Tang, C. F. Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries. Energy Policy 60, 813–819 (2013).
Jiang, Y. Foreign direct investment, pollution, and the environmental quality: A model with empirical evidence from the Chinese regions. Int. Trade J. 29(3), 212–227 (2015).
Ren, S. et al. International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: A case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Econ. Rev. 28, 123–134 (2014).
Tang, C. F. & Tan, B. W. The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79, 447–454 (2015).
Omri, A. & Kahouli, B. Causal relationships between energy consumption, foreign direct investment and economic growth: Fresh evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equations models. Energy Policy 67, 913–922 (2014).
Dong, K.-Y. et al. A review of China’s energy consumption structure and outlook based on a long-range energy alternatives modeling tool. Pet. Sci. 14(1), 214–227 (2017).
WDI, World Development Indicator. https://data.worldbank.org/, (2022).
OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://data.oecd.org/, (2021).
Levin, A., Lin, C.-F. & Chu, C.-S.J. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J. Econom. 108(1), 1–24 (2002).
Breitung, J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2001).
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. & Shin, Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J. Econom. 115(1), 53–74 (2003).
Hlouskova, J. & Wagner, M. The performance of panel unit root and stationarity tests: Results from a large scale simulation study. Economet. Rev. 25(1), 85–116 (2006).
Narayan, P. K. & Narayan, S. Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38(1), 661–666 (2010).
Pedroni, P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 61(S1), 653–670 (1999).
Pedroni, P. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economet. Theor. 20(3), 597–625 (2004).
Kao, C. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J. Econom. 90(1), 1–44 (1999).
Breusch, T. S. & Pagan, A. R. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47(1), 239–253 (1980).
Baltagi, B. H. and Hashem Pesaran, M. Heterogeneity and cross section dependence in panel data models: Theory and applications introduction. 229–232 (Wiley Online Library, 2007).
Levine, S. & Kendall, K. Energy efficiency and conservation: Opportunities, obstacles, and experiences. Vt. J. Envtl. L. 8, 101 (2006).
Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W. A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica: J. Econom. Soc. 783–820 (1993).
Phillips, P.C. and Hansen, B.E. Estimation and inference in models of cointegration: A simulation study. (Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, 1988).
Pedroni, P. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels, in Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2001).
Kao, C. and Chiang, M.-H. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data, in Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2001).
Liobikienė, G. & Butkus, M. Scale, composition, and technique effects through which the economic growth, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and trade affect greenhouse gas emissions. Renew. Energy 132, 1310–1322 (2019).
Balsalobre-Lorente, D. et al. The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries. Renew. Energy 185, 1441–1455 (2022).
Sarkodie, S. A. & Adams, S. Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: Accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 643, 1590–1601 (2018).
Mohamued, E. A. et al. Global oil price and innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending, oil price and oil price volatility on GHG emissions. Energies 14(6), 1757 (2021).
Iqbal, N. et al. Does exports diversification and environmental innovation achieve carbon neutrality target of OECD economies?. J. Environ. Manage. 291, 112648 (2021).
Edenhofer, O. et al. Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
Owusu, P. A. & Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng. 3(1), 1167990 (2016).